Additive map
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
top
In algebra, an additive map, Z {\displaystyle Z} -linear map or additive function is a function f {\displaystyle f} that preserves the addition operation:cite-ref-1[1] f ( x + y ) = f ( x ) + f ( y ) {\displaystyle f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)} for every pair of elements x {\displaystyle x} and y {\displaystyle y} in the domain of f . {\displaystyle f.} For example, any linear map is additive. When the domain is the real numbers, this is Cauchy's functional equation. For a specific case of this definition, see additive polynomial.
More formally, an additive map is a Z {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} } -module homomorphism. Since an abelian group is a Z {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} } -module, it may be defined as a group homomorphism between abelian groups.
A map V × × W → → X {\displaystyle V\times W\to X} that is additive in each of two arguments separately is called a bi-additive map or a Z {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} } -bilinear map.cite-ref-2[2]
Contents
• Examples
• See also
• Notes
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Examples
Typical examples include maps between rings, vector spaces, or modules that preserve the additive group. An additive map does not necessarily preserve any other structure of the object; for example, the product operation of a ring.
If f {\displaystyle f} and g {\displaystyle g} are additive maps, then the map f + g {\displaystyle f+g} (defined pointwise) is additive.
Properties
Definition of scalar multiplication by an integer
Suppose that X {\displaystyle X} is an additive group with identity element 0 {\displaystyle 0} and that the inverse of x ∈ ∈ X {\displaystyle x\in X} is denoted by − − x . {\displaystyle -x.} For any x ∈ ∈ X {\displaystyle x\in X} and integer n ∈ ∈ Z , {\displaystyle n\in \mathbb {Z} ,} let: n x := { 0 when n = 0 , x + ⋯ ⋯ + x ( n summands) when n > 0 , ( − − x ) + ⋯ ⋯ + ( − − x ) ( | n | summands) when n < 0 , {\displaystyle nx:=\left\{{\begin{alignedat}{9}&&&0&&&&&&~~~~&&&&~{\text{ when }}n=0,\\&&&x&&+\cdots +&&x&&~~~~{\text{(}}n&&{\text{ summands) }}&&~{\text{ when }}n>0,\\&(-&&x)&&+\cdots +(-&&x)&&~~~~{\text{(}}|n|&&{\text{ summands) }}&&~{\text{ when }}n<0,\\\end{alignedat}}\right.} Thus ( − − 1 ) x = − − x {\displaystyle (-1)x=-x} and it can be shown that for all integers m , n ∈ ∈ Z {\displaystyle m,n\in \mathbb {Z} } and all x ∈ ∈ X , {\displaystyle x\in X,} ( m + n ) x = m x + n x {\displaystyle (m+n)x=mx+nx} and − − ( n x ) = ( − − n ) x = n ( − − x ) . {\displaystyle -(nx)=(-n)x=n(-x).} This definition of scalar multiplication makes the cyclic subgroup Z x {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} x} of X {\displaystyle X} into a left Z {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} } -module; if X {\displaystyle X} is commutative, then it also makes X {\displaystyle X} into a left Z {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} } -module.
Homogeneity over the integers
If f : X → → Y {\displaystyle f:X\to Y} is an additive map between additive groups then f ( 0 ) = 0 {\displaystyle f(0)=0} and for all x ∈ ∈ X , {\displaystyle x\in X,} f ( − − x ) = − − f ( x ) {\displaystyle f(-x)=-f(x)} (where negation denotes the additive inverse) andcite-ref-3[proof 1] f ( n x ) = n f ( x ) for all n ∈ ∈ Z . {\displaystyle f(nx)=nf(x)\quad {\text{ for all }}n\in \mathbb {Z} .} Consequently, f ( x − − y ) = f ( x ) − − f ( y ) {\displaystyle f(x-y)=f(x)-f(y)} for all x , y ∈ ∈ X {\displaystyle x,y\in X} (where by definition, x − − y := x + ( − − y ) {\displaystyle x-y:=x+(-y)} ).
In other words, every additive map is homogeneous over the integers. Consequently, every additive map between abelian groups is a homomorphism of Z {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} } -modules.
Homomorphism of Q {\displaystyle \mathbb {Q} } -modules
If the additive abelian groups X {\displaystyle X} and Y {\displaystyle Y} are also a unital modules over the rationals Q {\displaystyle \mathbb {Q} } (such as real or complex vector spaces) then an additive map f : X → → Y {\displaystyle f:X\to Y} satisfies:cite-ref-4[proof 2] f ( q x ) = q f ( x ) for all q ∈ ∈ Q and x ∈ ∈ X . {\displaystyle f(qx)=qf(x)\quad {\text{ for all }}q\in \mathbb {Q} {\text{ and }}x\in X.} In other words, every additive map is homogeneous over the rational numbers. Consequently, every additive maps between unital Q {\displaystyle \mathbb {Q} } -modules is a homomorphism of Q {\displaystyle \mathbb {Q} } -modules.
Despite being homogeneous over Q , {\displaystyle \mathbb {Q} ,} as described in the article on Cauchy's functional equation, even when X = Y = R , {\displaystyle X=Y=\mathbb {R} ,} it is nevertheless still possible for the additive function f : R → → R {\displaystyle f:\mathbb {R} \to \mathbb {R} } to not be homogeneous over the real numbers; said differently, there exist additive maps f : R → → R {\displaystyle f:\mathbb {R} \to \mathbb {R} } that are not of the form f ( x ) = s 0 x {\displaystyle f(x)=s_{0}x} for some constant s 0 ∈ ∈ R . {\displaystyle s_{0}\in \mathbb {R} .} In particular, there exist additive maps that are not linear maps.
See also
Notes
cite-note-11. ↑ citerefleslie-hogben2013Leslie Hogben (2013), Handbook of Linear Algebra (3 ed.), CRC Press, pp. 30–8, ISBN 9781498785600
cite-note-22. ↑ citerefn-bourbaki1989N. Bourbaki (1989), Algebra Chapters 1–3, Springer, p. 243
Proofs
cite-note-3proof 1. ↑ f ( 0 ) = f ( 0 + 0 ) = f ( 0 ) + f ( 0 ) {\displaystyle f(0)=f(0+0)=f(0)+f(0)} so adding − − f ( 0 ) {\displaystyle -f(0)} to both sides proves that f ( 0 ) = 0. {\displaystyle f(0)=0.} If x ∈ ∈ X {\displaystyle x\in X} then 0 = f ( 0 ) = f ( x + ( − − x ) ) = f ( x ) + f ( − − x ) {\displaystyle 0=f(0)=f(x+(-x))=f(x)+f(-x)} so that f ( − − x ) = − − f ( x ) {\displaystyle f(-x)=-f(x)} where by definition, ( − − 1 ) f ( x ) := − − f ( x ) . {\displaystyle (-1)f(x):=-f(x).} Induction shows that if n ∈ ∈ N {\displaystyle n\in \mathbb {N} } is positive then f ( n x ) = n f ( x ) {\displaystyle f(nx)=nf(x)} and that the additive inverse of n f ( x ) {\displaystyle nf(x)} is n ( − − f ( x ) ) , {\displaystyle n(-f(x)),} which implies that f ( ( − − n ) x ) = f ( n ( − − x ) ) = n f ( − − x ) = n ( − − f ( x ) ) = − − ( n f ( x ) ) = ( − − n ) f ( x ) {\displaystyle f((-n)x)=f(n(-x))=nf(-x)=n(-f(x))=-(nf(x))=(-n)f(x)} (this shows that f ( n x ) = n f ( x ) {\displaystyle f(nx)=nf(x)} holds for n < 0 {\displaystyle n<0} ). ◼ ◼ {\displaystyle \blacksquare }
cite-note-4proof 2. ↑ Let x ∈ ∈ X {\displaystyle x\in X} and q = m n ∈ ∈ Q {\displaystyle q={\frac {m}{n}}\in \mathbb {Q} } where m , n ∈ ∈ Z {\displaystyle m,n\in \mathbb {Z} } and n > 0. {\displaystyle n>0.} Let y := 1 n x . {\displaystyle y:={\frac {1}{n}}x.} Then n y = n ( 1 n x ) = ( n 1 n ) x = ( 1 ) x = x , {\displaystyle ny=n\left({\frac {1}{n}}x\right)=\left(n{\frac {1}{n}}\right)x=(1)x=x,} which implies f ( x ) = f ( n y ) = n f ( y ) = n f ( 1 n x ) {\displaystyle f(x)=f(ny)=nf(y)=nf\left({\frac {1}{n}}x\right)} so that multiplying both sides by 1 n {\displaystyle {\frac {1}{n}}} proves that f ( 1 n x ) = 1 n f ( x ) . {\displaystyle f\left({\frac {1}{n}}x\right)={\frac {1}{n}}f(x).} Consequently, f ( q x ) = f ( m n x ) = m f ( 1 n x ) = m ( 1 n f ( x ) ) = q f ( x ) . {\displaystyle f(qx)=f\left({\frac {m}{n}}x\right)=mf\left({\frac {1}{n}}x\right)=m\left({\frac {1}{n}}f(x)\right)=qf(x).} ◼ ◼ {\displaystyle \blacksquare }
References
• citerefroger-c-lyndonpaul-e-schupp2001Roger C. Lyndon; Paul E. Schupp (2001), Combinatorial Group Theory, Springer